Even the “as an American I’m allowed to say that” nonsense aside, why should anyone be allowed to use any racist term regardless, doesn’t matter if it doesn’t offend you in particular.
(as an American, I’m allowed to call them that)
As a white person I’m allowed to call you a bleach demon.
Fun fact, anyone can call us bleach demons. It’s fun for the whole family!
as an american im allowed
no, i don’t think you are
We need to do to Americans what they did to our people with those signs they used to put up in places where it said: ‘‘No Chinese, No Puertorricans, No Blacks, No Dogs Allowed’’ and watch them seethe.
a sign on the door of a bar with “No amerikkkans allowed” would make the rounds on twitter and reddit for the next decade
“My agency-ascribing racism is far superior to your conspiracy theory racism.”
How many levels of racism you on my dude?
Oh like 5.
Ha, you are like baby, watch THIS:
When your decades long, inter-generational racism project begins to conflict with your current day Zionist project (i.e. your other inter-generational racism project).
I do always get a kick out of reading these sorts of inter-nazi debates. They are similar in flavor to flat earth threads where the goal is mostly nihilistic tormenting of the other side with maddening requests for clarity on how such-and-such is explained. “Why did Jewish people help lobby for age of consent laws and why do Christians like child marriage” is another topic guaranteed to bring out torturous logic among this crowd.
And they never have coherent answers to anything. It always descends into calling the other side various slurs or accusing them of being a trans Judeo-Bolshevik Islamist Indian. You look at leftists debating each other and even the most heated arguments have citations, structure, and material analysis. Rightwing arguments immediately turn into struggle sessions where they resort to name calling and temper tantrums.
You look at leftists debating each other and even the most heated arguments have citations, structure, and material analysis.
Don’t forget poop on pig balls, a beautiful riposte in a debate.
when you said “National Socialists of TikTok” i thought you were talking about libs of tiktok in a cheeky way but then i saw it and
Mfw I see this shit
The phrasing makes it sound like she’s calling Americans the barbarian horde.
I can’t completely parse this screed, it’s so racist.
I honestly cannot tell what else that sentence could possible mean (“as an American, I’m allowed to call them that”).
It means, “I’m an American, I can call Muslims slurs because supposedly europeans are rounded up into gulags for being Islamaphobes”
It’s unreal the crybaby persecution complex these people have when they’ve never been the victims of anything in their entire lives.
It’s very pathetic, but unfortunately it’s very successful online propaganda. Most conservatives believe this.
I thought it meant “9/11 happened ergo I get to be a bigot against all Muslims.”
I’m sure that’s a part of it, but chuds believe, particularly in Germany and the UK, that if you say something bad about muslims, you’ll be sent to jail
that would be more accurate than her racist ranting
I have thought it is strange that Nazis idolise Hitler. He was an incompetent coked-out buffoon who only got into power because of liberal enabling. I thought that modern neo-nazis would try to distance themselves from him and “reinvent” naziism. Surprised I’ve seen so little of that sort of thing.
I suppose Fascists don’t really understand why they are fascists, they are just jumping at shadows everywhere and are wholly reactionary.
Romaboos and teaboos always made more sense than Wehraboos because those two at least glaze empires that lasted for more than 2 decades lol
Romaboos are some of the most incoherent people in the world, because the empire they worship was one of the most regressive empires in history.
“Nazi Germany seemed to be working until it suddenly stopped, sadly overwhelmed by asiatic barbarian hordes and the internal sabotage of leftists and sympathizers. Next time we’ll be more ruthless and strategic in our targets” seems to be the prevailing logic from their point of view. They selectively disregard how Nazi Germany ended up, do not understand its internal contradictions, do not understand dialectical materialism so they don’t realize that things contain within themselves the seeds of their own destruction.
The “new nazism” of Pax Americana incorporates zionism and “melting pot” concepts, getting rid of the one-drop rule and 1/2 / 1/4 / 1/8 system of strictly enforced racism for a more disparate and passive white supremacy that’s more cultural and economic background radiation and a gradient. You don’t see a neo-nazi flavor that throws Hitler under the bus because that role is already filled by American Liberal-Nazism. American ideology is the more “mature” and patient version of Nazism, getting the same results over a longer period of time.
That is a very good analysis, thank you!
And then libs say the far left and far right are the exact same. When this is the level of discourse on the right.
I’m actually not even sure what they’re trying to accomplish here, usually this kind of talk is reserved for the bourgeoise, you know like their private dinner tables where they can be openly racist and classist, but they’re just talking about this openly with no regards whatsoever for their reputation. Is it because they feel so safe now that they don’t even care for maintaining the appearance of “democratic” legitimacy and we’re gonna be getting straight up right wing dictators now?
The secretary’s statement has been standard, open talking points for very online chuds since like 2013. It used to be be isolated to their shitty online commentary sphere, but it’s bled into the mainstream quite rapidly. It’s a sign of the times really…
The average person talks like this all the time. For whatever reason this society loves stupid douchebags.
