
Had some fun with this. Rules:
- When a tankie post comes up, post a legitimate, fair argument. Do not argue in bad faith. No matter how nasty the post may be. Legitimately combat the disinformation there by going into their bubble and posting a sane response.
- Watch the responses come in. Especially if the post is on the tankie triad.
- Don’t feed the trolls. Don’t respond to anything, unless there is actually a legitimate attempt to have a legitimate discussion. Otherwise, start a game of tankie bingo to help prevent yourself from responding to the madness.
Suggestions for expansion welcome.



Keep in mind, it’s this person from yesterday’s Tiananmen Square thread. So they can’t follow their own rules.
Liberal rules for “argument”:
1. Make shit up
2. Ask bad faith rhetorical questions
3. Demand proof that the shit you just made up didn’t happen
4. Run back crying to your liberal shithole to post about how you epicly owned the commies
If you ask a communist why you should believe what it says on ProleWiki
If you ask a liberal why you should believe what it says on Wikipedia
Ok, I know I asked for a lib that could actually engage with us seriously and intellectually, but at this point I’m just asking for a lib that isn’t a pathetic loser.
Liberal self-selection has you beat, anyone going to bat for liberalism in 2026 is a mondo-loser