infuziSporg [e/em/eir]

Every place a commune to be unleashed!

Padding the comment-to-post ratios since before choppo chæt was a thing.

  • 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 26th, 2020

help-circle
  • The project of Western civilization seems to be largely oriented around diminishing how many steps people take. Not merely as an energy-efficiency thing, but as something that indulges the human capacity for laziness.

    It’s backwards to think about “getting your steps in” when the whole society is structured around stopping you from walking places, by either bringing every resource right under your nose, or positioning it so far away that it would take several hours to walk there.

    It started with domestication of equines, progressed with the emergence of an underclass who could serve as porters or rickshaw operators, and went into overdrive with modern technology that hooked us on every last indolence through the power of ecological overshoot and resource depletion, concealing our connections to this through the opacity of the market.

    We tell ourselves histories about people having to go seek things out on foot, like it’s an unthinkable horror story.

    Walking is one of the most fundamental things to being human. You can think and talk and perceive and process the world while you walk. You form a real, internalized, unalienated connection with your world and the people in it when you walk. When we are unable or disincentivized to walk places, we end up with all kinds of health problems, which ironically then get trotted out as reasons why we shouldn’t walk places, and the spiral deepens.

    Smash the asphalt, send up the gas stations in a cloud of smoke, retvrn to communal living in the longhouse, and for the love of all that is holy, allow a pedestrian radius of more than 20 steps for major daily functions. A society that is sprawled out in the interest of bringing convenience to everyone right in their portioned-off space is not a society worth living under. A wise society has everyone (besides the critically infirm) walking at least 2 kilometers a day.

    America esse delendam
    Europa esse delendam
    Occidentum esse delendam















  • Part of the context for this is that there is a narrative over a few chapters in Genesis of Sodom and Gomorrah being the people everybody hates, objectionable both to their peers and to the divine observer. Abraham is the figure showing mercy and haggles with God to spare them if 50 (or 20, or even 10) righteous people can be found), and it is implied that not a single one is found.

    The ultimatums and threats made to Lot can more accurately be seen as sexual assault, as well as a violation of the cultural norm of hospitality to guests. Relevant to part of your question is that Lot, as the protagonist, does not see it as transgressive to give his already-betrothed (!) daughters over to his neighbors. To keep the story concise it would have made sense to give just one last particularly shocking offense before the resolution.

    Like with the rest of the Torah, the story was crafted in a certain social/historical context, passed down orally for generations, and then written down by multiple people trying to portray it coherently for the ages. It works nicely as an origin and identity story, but it breaks down if you nit-pick it, especially if you’re reading it in a modern Indo-European language. And vernacular nit-picking is what a lot of Protestants have made it their business to do.