Ok, since you aren’t interested in debate, we don’t need to do anything like that. That’s fine, I don’t really want to debate this topic either.
It is a shame that when I ask about your thoughts about this work, your response is to provide someone else’s thoughts on it. You’re really not beating any allegations that you haven’t actually read it and that you aren’t just hating on it because others have told you to do so.
Seriously, it’s extremely short. It’s barely over a thousand words. If you’ve read through this entire comment thread you’ve probably read more than this entire work. I’m not asking you to agree with me or make any sort of big life change or anything, but please, just read it and form your own opinions, you don’t need to share them if you don’t want to, but I do want you to think for yourself and make up your own mind. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
EDIT: Holy shit, this guy actually ran away to his own instance to cry about the evil tankies talking about a fucking thousand word pamphlet he’s too scared to read and form his own opinion on. I think this might actually be the most pathetic loser on the fedverse. Also I recognise them now, they’re the same loser who loves abusing the idea of disengaging when they realise they’re showing their whole ass in a discussion. So not just a loser, but also toxic and abusing a system designed to help people with triggers and mental health issues too!
Any user may disengage from any discussion by posting a two word, and only two word, reply: “I’m Disengaging”. Stipulations:
Do not post a lengthy reply and then end it with “I’m disengaging.”
Do not disengage yet continue to reply directly/indirectly to the user or about the user.
Do not complain when someone properly uses the feature on you.
Do not try to circumvent these restrictions by vague posting or bringing it up later in another thread.
Do not retroactively use disengage through editing posts or comments. Abusing disengage, failure to abide a proper disengagement, or circumventing the stipulations can result in moderator action.
Ok, since you aren’t interested in debate, we don’t need to do anything like that. That’s fine, I don’t really want to debate this topic either.
It is a shame that when I ask about your thoughts about this work, your response is to provide someone else’s thoughts on it. You’re really not beating any allegations that you haven’t actually read it and that you aren’t just hating on it because others have told you to do so.
Seriously, it’s extremely short. It’s barely over a thousand words. If you’ve read through this entire comment thread you’ve probably read more than this entire work. I’m not asking you to agree with me or make any sort of big life change or anything, but please, just read it and form your own opinions, you don’t need to share them if you don’t want to, but I do want you to think for yourself and make up your own mind. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
EDIT: Holy shit, this guy actually ran away to his own instance to cry about the evil tankies talking about a fucking thousand word pamphlet he’s too scared to read and form his own opinion on. I think this might actually be the most pathetic loser on the fedverse. Also I recognise them now, they’re the same loser who loves abusing the idea of disengaging when they realise they’re showing their whole ass in a discussion. So not just a loser, but also toxic and abusing a system designed to help people with triggers and mental health issues too!
/disengage
Is this the cringe mantra you repeat while sticking your fingers in your ears?
That’s a rule from your own instance you should probably respect
Except you aren’t following correctly either
Any user may disengage from any discussion by posting a two word, and only two word, reply: “I’m Disengaging”. Stipulations:
Sorry what part did I not follow correctly? That I said “disengage” and not “I’m disengaging”? In any case this wasn’t how it was phrased in the past.
And in other areas doing it as end of a reply that could be taken as an attack/making fun of them.
Where did I vague post about or bring up damascusart later?
It’s not just this one user you’ve done it on
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/23481626