• Soot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those stories are largely nothingburgers and aren’t indicative of anything. Grindr won’t magically crash because of an influx of users, that’s not how it works. The sole purpose of those stories is so libs can justify going “hah right wing people are gay take that” in a disgusting manner.

    The purported link has been studied repeatedly, most studies find no link at all, there are few possible indications, but if it exists it’s very weak.

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Grindr won’t magically crash because of an influx of users, that’s not how it works.

      I agree with your overall point but an online service crashing due to a huge spike in users is definitely a thing.

      • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But there is no ‘spike’ in users. The only story is existing users are moving around (which is true of… any big movement of people). So when I say ‘influx’, I just mean people moving from one place to another. Nobody is possibly claiming that republican party conventions somehow make tens of thousands of people sign up to Grindr, right?

    • Commiechameleon [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, unfortunately I’ll have to disagree somewhat because the amount of conservative gays(dls mostly) I’ve had the displeasure of speaking to, one of which heavily recommended 2000 mules. However I wouldn’t put it past a lib to own the rightoids by stretching the truth more than a fair bit.

      I’ll be looking into it though, sounds concerning melon-musk