A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a protest in San Diego against ICE.


On January 7th, 37-year-old Renee Good was murdered by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. While a considerable amount of the discussion online has been about the direction her wheels were turning and things like that, truthfully, I think it’s just fundamentally bad to shoot a person to death with a gun if you happen to be a state mercenary enforcing an incredibly racist federal policy, regardless of the circumstances.

The murder has since prompted a wave of vigils and protests, not only in Minneapolis, but also in virtually every major city in the country. The demands are justice for Good in particular, and the abolition of ICE in general, to avenge its many victims. The Trump administration has done all they can to inflame the situation, designating Good a “domestic terrorist” and saying that the agent who shot her will be immune from prosecution.

Protests and resistance to this administration’s policies have, encouragingly, had an element of international solidarity - not only are flags from countries throughout Latin America (and also Palestine) present, but speakers in protests have even been actively condemning the recent imperialist actions against Venezuela. For it is, of course, one joint struggle. The imperial boomerang always returns - and in the modern day, it returns rapidly.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


    • companero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      If China is smart they will be working behind the scenes diplomatically, at the bare minimum. Keep an eye on how Pakistan reacts to this.

      • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pakistan has good relations with Iran, they won’t be happy to see an attack but unless they’re willing to officially extend their nuclear umbrella and alienate the US I don’t see what they will be able to do about it

        • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It was rumoured that Pakistan extended their nuclear umbrella to Iran, in the event of a nuclear strike, in the 12 day war.

          Pakistan also knows that they’re probably next after Iran. Mossad + India already tried to denuclearize them during that brief conflict.

          • mx_oceanwater_they_them [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            As far as I know:

            • Pakistan Iran relations are not that great - they bombed each other over Balochi separatist movements, and do not trade much, heck even India trades more with Iran than Pakistan, despite a shared land-border?
            • Pakistan - China relations are stronger than Iran - China relations. While Iran-India relations are stronger than India-Pakistan relations.
            • There are some fringe racist Persian/Iranian factions that despise Pakistanis (and Arabs) for being “browner” compared to Aryan lineage, idk. Maybe I read too much twitter.
            • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              3 days ago

              they bombed each other over Balochi separatist movements

              This was a joint collaborative effort by Iran and Pakistan, where they scratched each other’s backs. Notice how neither ever escalated or got mad about it. Both used each other to deal with problematic populations without legal issues. This is actually proof of how close they are, and their collaboration.

              Pakistan - China relations are stronger than Iran - China relations.

              There’s nothing stopping a nation from being friendly with multiple countries at once.

              There are some fringe racist Persian/Iranian factions that despise Pakistanis (and Arabs) for being “browner” compared to Aryan lineage, idk. Maybe I read too much twitter.

              Not in government. Every nation has racists, this is completely irrelevant

            • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              “There are some racist Persian factions that despise Pakistanis for being browner compared to Aryan lineage, idk. Maybe I read too much twitter.”

              I think we’ve all seen the Iranian diaspora’s Israel flags and rabid disavowing of being Arab. It may be true, but they hardly need to react like a white supremacist being called black.

              The circumstances of that bombing are allegedly about the Balochi seperatism. They both bombed Balochis in each other’s borders, and everything was over within 48 hours.

              Given that Iran also did strikes in Syria and Iraq, I believe there was a scheme that Iran had to urgently put down - that the public still doesn’t know about.

              • It may be true, but they hardly need to react like a white supremacist being called black.

                Can you expand on what you mean by that? I have seen some horrible memes (for the slop section on hexbear maybe) about some Pro-Protest account about supporting to “erase all Sunnis” (Pelavi was not radical enough), become Zhoroastrian again, and stop “worshiping Arabs (and their religion)”.

                Also I knew an Afghan personally who told me he was treated badly for racist reasons in Teheran.

                • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Pro-protester saying to erase Sunnis is a strange one. I think that’s an Israeli op - they do try to put a wedge between Iranians and Arabs.

                  If anything, I hear pro-Pahlavi ex-muslim Iranians taking the Sunni line and calling Shiism an Iranian made up version of Islam.

                  If an anti-iran gov person says something Islamophobic, it’s against all Muslims.

                  If they say something racist - it coincides with American racism, but carves an exception for Iranians (except Arabs). So Afghans, Arabs, and others are treated as lower.

                  Yes Afghans are treated terribly. I am 2-hop away from an Iranian doctor who non-consensually removed an Afghan immigrant’s uterus. Reminiscent of what white American doctors have been doing to Latin-American immigrants.

          • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            Which countries?

            Azerbaijan is hostile to Iran, but their Turkish masters do not want to see Iran balkanized because of the Kurdish issue. Moreover, they are surrounded by Armenia, Russia, and Iran. They only have potentially hostile countries as neighbours if they pick a fight.

            Afghanistan won’t do anything unless the water issue comes up right now somehow. But they already fought with Pakistan last year, and that adventurism didn’t go well for them. It would be a massive risk to collaborate with the US and have a surviving Iran pulverize them.

            Iraq won’t do anything. They are partially vassalized by Iran.

            Turkey is friendly as an intelligence collaborator, despite being a NATO country. Again on the Kurdish issue.

            Pakistan, similar to Turkey, in the Balochi issue.

            Turkmenistan never does anything geopolitically.

      • hotspur [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        No good definite source, but I heard on a podcast a former US Col. speculating that China had helped Iran black out all the Israeli starlink terminals they’d smuggled into the country. Seems plausible, but I don’t have confirmation to offer either.

          • hotspur [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not saying they dont have the capability—I just mentioned it because the commentator seemed confident that China had provided assistance (they have been on a starlight tear recently) as an example that China and Russia had stronger location/geopolitical interests in Iran compared to Venezuela.

        • mkultrawide [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          My understanding is that you can basically black out Starlink by jamming GPS, and that tech has been around for decades. I’m not an engineer, though.

          • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            There’s also a one click “fix” in the application to make Starlink use Starlink satellites to determine the position of the receiver, and not GPS. How well does this “fix” work, is unclear. But it is a setting that can be enabled. Iranians who own Starlink are probably not enabling it because they don’t know about it, and can’t find out because the internet is down. Mossad/CIA have their own lines of communication not available to civilians.

            • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              It was funny to see them share the tips on how to re-enable StarLink internet in Iran - over the internet on Twitter.

              They are clearly quite desperate to get the word out. Not a good sign for them.

            • starlink use Starlink satellites to determine the position of the receiver

              Why is this option not enabled by default instead of the old GPS? I assume the starlink positioning system is harder to jam than GPS? For me this indicates this fix does not work well.

      • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s tough, Iran has to balance:

        • The fact that Israel and US have nukes.
        • The fact that Israel’s goal is to get the US drawn in to do all of the fighting.
        • The fact that, as time passes, the US is becoming less prominent and less invested in West Asia.
        • The serious risk that its population would not tolerate a brutal war of attrition if it looked like Iran was starting it.

        Waiting for the Israeli strikes last time did a number on Iran. But it also established to Iran’s neighbours that Iran is not the rogue nation here, that they are interested in the stability of the region, and that Israel is not.

        Less valuably, the people of the world also saw this fact. Whereas, had Iran attacked first - it would’ve been used to further delegitamize Iran’s position, it would have alienated China and Iran’s neighbours, and it would have been used to delegitamize the Palestinian resistance.

        Iran at the very least relies on China, Russia, and India for parts, food, electronics and other staples of the economy.

        • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          What does any of that matter if all the neighboring nations don’t aid Iran and abide by anti-Iran sanctions, despite having a “better opinion” of Iran? Israel just did a genocide in front of the world. What did any of that diplomacy and good faith building achieve them? Very little it seems.

              • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                3 days ago

                Russia for one is still trading.

                China reduced investments, but still bought oil.

                Time will tell what China and India do in response to the 25% tariff threat.

                Russia, Venezuela, North Korea would be unscathed by the tariff threat.

            • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              Don’t think the gulf states would risk it, as they are extremely vulnerable economically. They will remain “neutral” while aiding America and Israel in every way possible short of actually fighting Iran, thus removing the trump card Iran has of blowing up gulf state infrastructure. A world where Saudi Arabia and Iran are friendly but not allies is actually more dangerous for Iran, as they no longer have any meaningful way to retaliate in the value exchange

              • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 days ago

                This is more of a counterpoint to my own statements, but the Persian Gulf states did participate in early warning and tracking of the Iranian response.

                • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There’s also the fact that all these gulf states don’t actually have real effective militaries so there’s no real point of them “joining the anti-Iran coalition”. They have groups of ganjaweed jihadist light infantry that they move around from country to country, but this is not an actual military that could mount an invasion of Iran. These groups can’t defeat Ansarallah, let alone Iran itself. Any time they are given helicopters or tanks they end up crashing them or getting them stolen.

                  They would let the US/Israel use their airspace to make attacks, shoot down retaliatory missiles and do recon. They will let the US/Israel use their airports and seaports for logistics and recon. Jordan and Qatar were doing this during the last altercation.

                  • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I do think the other points like Iran’s domestic politics and the Israeli strategy are stronger.

                    Iran has a very tough economy, starting conflict won’t go over well. Even being attacked, quite a number in Iran blame Iran.

                    And Iran needs to not help Israel bait the US into doing their dirty work.

              • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                The why was Soleimani negotiating a rapprochement with Saudi Arabia right before he was killed?

                The Iranian failure to protect its axis of resistance is associated with the loss of Soleimani’s leadership.