A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a protest in San Diego against ICE.


On January 7th, 37-year-old Renee Good was murdered by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. While a considerable amount of the discussion online has been about the direction her wheels were turning and things like that, truthfully, I think it’s just fundamentally bad to shoot a person to death with a gun if you happen to be a state mercenary enforcing an incredibly racist federal policy, regardless of the circumstances.

The murder has since prompted a wave of vigils and protests, not only in Minneapolis, but also in virtually every major city in the country. The demands are justice for Good in particular, and the abolition of ICE in general, to avenge its many victims. The Trump administration has done all they can to inflame the situation, designating Good a “domestic terrorist” and saying that the agent who shot her will be immune from prosecution.

Protests and resistance to this administration’s policies have, encouragingly, had an element of international solidarity - not only are flags from countries throughout Latin America (and also Palestine) present, but speakers in protests have even been actively condemning the recent imperialist actions against Venezuela. For it is, of course, one joint struggle. The imperial boomerang always returns - and in the modern day, it returns rapidly.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    US to push for quicker action in reducing reliance on China for rare earths

    spoiler

    WASHINGTON, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will urge Group of Seven nations and others to step up their efforts to reduce reliance on critical minerals from China when he hosts a dozen top finance officials on Monday, a senior U.S. official said. The meeting, which kicks off with a dinner on Sunday evening, will include finance ministers or cabinet ministers from the G7 advanced economies, the European Union, Australia, India, South Korea and Mexico, said the official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Sign up here. Together, the grouping accounts for 60% of global demand for critical minerals. “Urgency is the theme of the day. It’s a very big undertaking. There’s a lot of different angles, a lot of different countries involved and we really just need to move faster,” the official said. Bessent on Friday told Reuters that he had been pressing for a separate meeting on the issue since a G7 leaders summit in Canada in June, where he delivered a rare earths presentation to gathered heads of state from the U.S., Britain, Japan, Canada, Germany, France, Italy and the European Union. Leaders agreed to an action plan at the summit to secure their supply chains and boost their economies, but Bessent has grown frustrated about the lack of urgency demonstrated by attendees, the official said. Aside from Japan, which took action after China abruptly cut off its critical minerals supplies in 2010, G7 members remain heavily dependent on critical minerals from China, which has threatened to impose strict export controls. China dominates the critical minerals supply chain, refining between 47% and 87% of copper, lithium, cobalt, graphite and rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency. These minerals are used in defense technologies, semiconductors, renewable energy components, batteries and refining processes. The U.S. is expected to issue a statement after the meeting, but no specific joint action is likely, the official added. US URGES OTHERS TO FOLLOW ITS LEAD

    “The United States is in the posture of calling everyone together, showing leadership, sharing what we have in mind going forward," said the official. “We’re ready to move with those who feel a similar level of urgency … and others can join as they come to the realization of how serious this is.” The official gave no details on what further steps were planned by the Trump administration, which is pushing forward to boost domestic production and reduce reliance on China through agreements with Australia, Ukraine and other producers. The U.S. signed an agreement with Australia in October aimed at countering China’s dominance in critical minerals that includes an $8.5 billion project pipeline. The deal leverages Australia’s proposed strategic reserve, which will supply metals like rare earths and lithium that are vulnerable to disruption. The official said there had been progress, but more work was needed. “It’s not solved,” they added. Canberra has said it has subsequently received interest from Europe, Japan, South Korea and Singapore. Monday’s meeting comes days after reports that China had begun restricting exports to Japanese companies of rare earths and powerful magnets containing them, as well as banning exports of dual-use items to the Japanese military. The meeting was planned well before that action, U.S. officials said. China was still living up to its commitments to purchase U.S. soybeans and ship critical minerals to U.S. firms.

    spoiler


    Alright, a few thoughts have occurred to me and I wanted to see if someone who understands this better than me could answer:

    What is the likelihood that the PRC will lose its leverage with regards to rare earths?

    Would every country establishing a strategic reserve not also cause the price to continue to skyrocket?

    Finally, why doesn’t China require everyone to purchase rare earths in yuan instead of stopping the flow of goods? Wouldn’t that create demand for the renminbi and threaten dollar hegemony? I am sure there are probably deleterious consequences for this, but it seems like offering most (maybe not all) rare earths with almost no limitations, as long as it is traded in renminbi, would likely put a stop to these foreign ventures attempting to mine and process rare earths- because it might create a less forgiving price pressure that could bankrupt the companies or threaten to nullify their capital expenditures… right? But without relinquishing control over the production itself? Its best for world peace if the US loses access to rare earths, but the US becoming less reliant on China seems like a big L for the PRC and for world peace also

    • egg1918 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read a great article using gallium as an example. Can’t find it but it was basically this:

      Gallium is made by refining waste products from the production of aluminum. The only way to make gallium commercially viable is to have an aluminum industry the size of China’s. They have 10x the production of second placed India.

      China produced 43 billion tons of aluminum last year. The United States produced 670,000.

      It’s simply too late

    • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      the US cannot increase production without straight-up guaranteeing profit streams (or nationalization which it is incapable of) and even then it is a 20 year project that China can undercut the price of at any time

      • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel like guaranteeing profits is fair game for them. That was the basis of the chips act, the bailout of Silicon Valley Bank, the Affordable Care Act, the Iraq War… you name it

        • oliveoil [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          2 days ago

          Guaranteeing profits upon completion of the project doesn’t mean that it will actually necessarily happen after all of the changes in US politics in 20 years.

          It’s safe to say Democrats would upload a similar priority, but capital would have to face a serious risk investing in developing this in a volatile US - while facing the backdrop of a stable China.

      • coolusername [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        the US is already taking stakes in critical mineral companies. look at MP for one. they also plan on setting price floors for critical minerals, meaning that prices will be higher for US and western-aligned (threatened) countries than those that buy from China. paying more is not that big of a deal for the military-industrial complex since they have infinite money thanks to the federal reserve.

    • companero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 days ago

      Use it before you lose it. The US is already decoupling itself, and they are going to pursue domestic rare earth refining capabilities regardless of what China does.

      Now is a pretty good time because the US needs rare earths for their massive military buildup (+$600 billion to the budget).

      Also ending US geopolitical hegemony is more important than ending dollar dominance. The latter will come as a result of the former.

    • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      why doesn’t China require everyone to purchase rare earths in yuan instead of stopping the flow of goods? Wouldn’t that create demand for the renminbi and threaten dollar hegemony?

      Why would China want that in the short term? They have a huge amount of USD as a colossal exporter nation

      • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, you are correct that I don’t know if China would even want this, but in the short term, could it not give China additional protection against sanctions? Could they not then control the flow of yuan to protect their interests and reward allies? Long term, if the economies of many countries become reliant on a steady flow of renminbi, could they not then have their own mechanism of sanctions that could work as a check against the US? I mean, if they ultimately want to replace the dollar as world reserve currency, it would make sense to do it with a currency they control (if they can’t get get other nations to agree to something like a Bancor, that would probably be the only favorable option?). If the US petrodollar system is based on an agreement to trade oil in dollars, and rare earths are also essential to modern warfare and technology, could China not assert more control over the global economy to counter the US financial regime? That is, if other nations truly are unable to get their own rare earths industries running