• InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    How much truth is there to this comment?

    Every TV show uses wigs - every one - on every character. It is too much trouble to maintain continuity with “real hair.” It’s just unfair that people in real life have to compete with false standards.

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you ever see a scene where someone is taking a hat off or putting a hat on, it’s a wig. Just think about how quickly your hair gets messed up by a hat. Now imagine having to do a take 20 times and fixing that hair after each take.

      I think they do the same thing with liquid/blood spill patterns. They have a rubber mat that’s just kinda wetted for the shoot that keeps the pattern consistent.

    • it wouldn’t astonish me if true.

      tangentially to this post, but more in line with the overall topic of constructed hair: i watched this YT video one time of this guy creating what he termed a “hair unit” or “hair system” for this dude with typical male pattern baldness. i can’t find the exact video, because it’s been years, but there’s a shitload of them now. basically, it’s like a semi-permanent wig for shorter hair.

      apparently these professionally installed systems last like 3-5 months, and from what I can tell are completely indistinguishable from homegrown except that the length stays precisely as they were when installed.

      so, if i was in showbiz, i can totally see the appeal of having a static hair style for an episodic TV series, because the people who make and install these things professionally are wizards. it allows the actor to keep a character more aesthetically frozen without having to be that way themselves. or, as the article subject says, mitigate appearance issues related to health/aging.