• purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think it takes being very sharp to observe that to the extent that danger to the pig was remotely real, he deliberately put himself in danger to justify the shooting, and that means it obviously does not count as self defense (and I think there is legal precedent for that). It truth is obvious, it’s just a matter of a chud judge or jury going “Yah, based” anyway.

      Edit: Also, two shots were in the side window, right? What’s the claim there? That she was going to hit him with the car door? That she was going to circle around and try to hit him “again”? It’s all nonsense.