Edit: I updated the title per suggestions.

Edit: I apologize for snapping at people in the comments. I was arguing with someone earlier today and bad habits make preventable mistakes. I’ll do better.

I deliberately didn’t talk about the current events going on in Iran with the justification that a) I’m not from there b) I don’t know enough. But this article takes some concepts I thought I knew and spits them back at me.

I kept quiet about Israel for a long time because I was afraid of being called a bigot, and I will regret that until I die. So why am I suddenly willing to do this again when it comes to Iran? Because some of their interests align with mine? Because I’m afraid of pissing off reactionaries even within leftist spaces and then losing access to them?

What sort of Anarchist, leftist, or being capable of empathy would I be if I remain silent when I know something is wrong.

  • CocteauChameleons [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Because some of their interests align with mine? Because I’m afraid of pissing off reactionaries even within leftist spaces and then losing access to them?

    Nah, nobody is supporting Iran rn because they don’t care about patriarchy just seems like radlib take

    On the one hand, white American reactionaries pretend to care about our oppression so they can morally license bombing us “to save our women”–the “damsel in distress” narrative. On the other, white American leftists deny our oppression even exists, because they think if they acknowledge we–queer and trans Iranians, Iranian women, Iranian children–are oppressed, then it means they’ll be morally obligated to bomb us.

    “On the other” is bullshit, literally r/neoliberal take